Keeping Faith By Jodi Picoult

7 April 2011

Keeping Faith, while it is over ten years old, is my latest Jodi Picoult read. I recently discovered a slew of Picoult and Nicholas Sparks titles that I did not yet have under my belt. Thank goodness!

Keeping Faith

Keeping Faith

Plot: In Keeping Faith, Picoult tackles the topic of religion. In the midst of a emotionally devastating divorce, Mariah White’s seven year old daughter Faith begins to speak to G-d. And all though they are non-practicing Jews in a broken interfaith family, Faith begins to have the stigmata. Famous atheist Ian Fletcher, the anti-Billy Graham, sets out to prove that Faith is a fraud, and sets off a gripping custody case.

I think that “Keeping Faith” has some of my favorite Picoult characters. Each character is complex and damaged in ways that are very easy to relate to. And while the stage Picoult sets them on is surreal, their personalities and reactions are very realistic.

Mariah is the needy house wife and stay at home mommy who must learn to survive on her own. Mariah does not become ridiculously strong over night; Picoult develops her slowly. While I felt she still ended a little weak, I found it a very sincere portrayal. Ian is damaged goods with situational atheism. Picoult loves to write these cynical cranky male characters who just want to be loved, and Ian Fletcher is one of my favorites, right next to Jordan McAfee from The Pact19 Minutes and Salem Falls. Colin, Mariah’s ex-husband, makes a deliberate mistake that may cost him the love of his daughter. You hate Colin for what he did, but completely understand his broken heart. Millie, Mariah’s mother, is the loving and sassy mother who provides perfectly times comic relief and emotional support.

The crux of the book is religion, and here the author plays it safe. She does not attack religion, nor does she make any blatant arguments. She offers no alternative or conclusions. In fact, her approach may be too subtle, but she does not make the book untouchable by tackling the topic. She writes a perspective that is very palatable, even if it does get a little lost in a series of miracles and a little romance.

Keeping Faith is one of my new favorite Picoult novels.

Grade: B

Rating: 16+ for adult situations

Share

The End: Deaths in Fiction

24 March 2011

Now he belongs to the ages.”
Epitaph from Abraham Lincoln’s tombstone

Death has always been a fascination of mine. When I was a child I was labeled: odd, macabre, morbid even. Think Vada Sultenfuss in the movie My Girl. It seems being preoccupied with death works well with my Victorian fascination. But somehow I managed to grow up normal, but my interest in death didn’t subside. Death is a deeply symbolic act in literature, and specific character deaths always serve some great purpose on the part of the author. Sometimes I would cry, sometimes I would be heartbroken, and sometimes I would just ask “Why?” The following list is made up of the most profound literary deaths I have experienced in my reading career.

They aren’t the most famous ones, nor are they the most obvious ones (did no one see Dumbledore’s death coming?), but to me, they were the most meaningful.

While I was researching this, I found this great page on Wikipedia about of famous epitaphs:

Spoilers: If you have not read the following books and would still like to, don’t read the rest of my post:  Tuck Everlasting, The House of Mirth, Lord of the Rings, Animal Farm, Tess of the D’Ubervilles, The Stand, Interview with the Vampire, or Cold Mountain

ghostTombstone (more…)

Share

Something Borrowed

8 March 2011
Something Borrowed by Emily Griffin is yet another book I picked up because I saw the movie trailer. That told me everything I needed to know about it. There are spoilers here, so don’t read the last paragraph if you don’t want to know about the end.
I don’t usually read “chick lit” like this. I usually cannot relate to contemporary romance stories. That being said, I was sold by the trailer.
Rachel is the studious goody two shoes who embarks upon an uncharacteristic affair with her best friend’s fiancee. Is Darcy really her best friend? Does Rachel really love Dex? Who is betraying who? Something Borrowed is a story about knowing who you are, what you want, and making the right decision for you.

Cast of Someting Borrowed

Cast of Someting Borrowed

I could really relate to the character of Rachel. She bends over backwards until she breaks, and when she breaks it is spectacular and a total disaster. Darcy is the classic perfect spoiled best friend who we are friend’s with because it makes us feel a little bit cooler to be friends with the cool girl. Darcy was pretty one-dimensional, and I am intrigued that the author wrote a follow-up from her perspective.

Rachel was a very well developed character, but she was frustrating at times. Her lack of action and confusion made me want to shake her, so thank goodness the author threw in two (Hilary and Ethan) side kicks who were fantastic comic relief and helped to break up the tension. There are some cliche over the top plot devices (i.e. flying off to London on a whim to “decompress”), but over all the novel is a pretty nice read.

Grade: B-
Rated: PG-13

Spoiler to follow!

Share

Go Ask Alice

21 February 2011
In an effort to be well rounded in my reading, I picked up the 1971 classic “Go Ask Alice” (it was $6 at Target). I never read this as a teenager, the drugs and sex part of the caption turned me off. Now, I’m glad I didn’t. I like to think I (thankfully) remained somewhat naïve in high school because I didn’t know what all the other kids were doing. It is marketed as a “true story” and the author is listed as Anonymous, but a little bit of research revealed that it has been listed as fiction since the mid-80’s and is thought to be authored by Beatrice Sparks.

Now that I’ve read it, I better understand the diary format that is very popular in angsty Young Adult Fiction. It is fairly easy to see how “Alice” must have been a catalyst for this.

Go_Ask_Alice_by_abandoned_echoes“Go Ask Alice”, read today, is a fairly standard cautionary tale about the path of habitual drug use. In the span of a summer, the author of the diary (we never know her name), goes from being a typical self-conscious, diet/boy obsessed teenager, to a habitual drug user who will do anything for her next fix. The protagonist experiences everything a teenager could possibly experience on the dark side of drugs, running away from home, dealing drugs, being arrested, prostitution, and homelessness.

While I appreciated the insight into the character’s mind, the pace is far too fast for the nature of the material. It is too difficult to get a sense for what she is experiencing before she is onto the next chapter of her miserable story. Part of that maybe be due to the graphic nature of some of the material, and the author thought it would be best to make it choppy so as not to give young readers to much time to dwell.
It is extremely explicit and graphic, so it is absolutely not for young or sensitive readers (I shouldn’t have even read it). But, it is an amazing insight into the thoughts and mentality of a teenager, so I would highly recommend it to parents looking to better understand the kind of dangers their child could face (please read “could” not necessarily “will”).
Grade: C
Rated: R
Share

This Book is Rated R!

17 February 2011
If movies have to be rated and TV has to be rated, why aren’t books rated? Why isn’t there any warning that there may be extreme violence, extreme sexuality, grotesque visuals, and/or crude and vulgar language? I am the first person to line up and wax on poetically about how ridiculous it is to edit “Huckleberry Finn”. But several explicit scenes (and on one page even a picture!) in “Water for Elephants” pushed me over the edge.

Water for Elephants was explicit for my tastes.

Water for Elephants was explicit for my tastes.

If it’s one thing that drive me crazy about contemporary literature, it’s that it is crude. I’m talking Middle Ages, potty mouth crude. And I just don’t understand it? Why is it that you as a contemporary author feels the need to describe the most grotesque things about the human experience? No, I don’t need to know how this character feels when they use the bathroom, or how certain things look when one character walks in on another naked or in a compromising situation. In fact, why did those scenes have to be there at all?

While browsing on twitter, I discovered that a high school in Beford, New Hampshire was using Water for Elephants in its curriculum. Now there is a mini-uproar because it was challenged and removed from the class. While I am usually open-minded about these things, I agree with this decision. Water for Elephants had very graphic scenes, so much so, I had to put the book down on several occasions. And don’t give me that “it’s for the sake of the art” line. These scenes had no place in this story.

Suggestive ad for the upcoming season of True Blood

Suggestive ad for the upcoming season of True Blood

I understand that you are trying to capture the human condition, but if you wouldn’t talk about it at the dinner party, then why did you put it in my book?

Charlaine Harris said in an interview recently that True Blood, the really popular show with the vampires, is far more graphic than she ever imagined scenes in her books. Here is an author, who herself considers her scenes to be graphic, shocked by how far things are being taken in our culture.

The ridiculously popular “The Girl Who…” series by Stieg Larson, only seems to be popular because there is a shocking and explicit rape scene in the first book. Why, no please, seriously, why is that so compelling to read about? Most serious critics finally admitted that the books weren’t really that good, but that they were swept up in the popularity.

Our culture has gone above and beyond to prove that we can push the envelope and really lay out the human condition raw and exposed for all to see. But I for one am tired of it. Call me old-fashioned or too conservative, or whatever, but there comes a point when we push too far.

Share

Oprah & Dickens

14 December 2010
Oprah has done it again, she has made her book club choices. ‘Tis the season for Dickens. I read an article on this called “Bad Expectations”, where the author criticizes Oprah, her book choices, and what she does to literature. I know we are all rolling our eyes over the fact that if Oprah recommends a book it is an instant best seller, but people let’s get serious here, in our media frenzied existence, how else do you expect to sell books?

So she doesn’t pick winners all the time, who does? You can honestly tell me you have loved every book you picked out for yourself? Yeah, that’s what I thought. Does it bother you that she is “reviving” classics? Really, that’s interesting, do you really think most Americans knew Charles Dickens had written anything besides Oliver Twist and A Christmas Carol until her December 2 episode? I promise you, they hadn’t. I would be willing to wager that besides Cliff Notes, most Americans haven’t actually read Charles Dickens. Google “Tale of Two Cities” and you will find the top two sites are Wikipedia and Spark Notes, and don’t try to tell me that’s for research. And this isn’t surprising, his books are difficult to access, even to the most hardened of literary buffs.

Oprah is getting people to read! She is doing for adults what Harry Potter did for children, making people pick up a book and actually try to sit through it. So what if Charles Dickens isn’t really a “hot chocolate” kind of book? In his time, he was considered mass market trash, so please spare me your snobbish view of his place in the cannon. At least people are going to learn that he wrote much more fascinating characters than Ebenezer Scrooge (not a Jew).  I personally dislike most of Dickens, so I would require some kind of sugary treat to help me drag myself through it. Despite that, I think this is fantastic!

In the past few years, I have noticed a decline in Dickens’ popularity. His works are heavy, light on romance, and his world is not entirely relatable, so in typical high school and college syllabi, he has been overshadowed by Jane Austen, William Shakespeare, and “other” (minority, queer, and other ignored demographics) literature. So if Oprah wants to revive him, props to her! Oprah sells books my friends, so let her.  There are so many other classics out there, choosing Dickens was a brave choice, and however she wants to sell him is fine by me, maybe someone out there will actually even like him.

Oprah’s Picks:

Tales of Two Cities and Great Expectations by Charles Dickens

Share

Where Realism Can Fail

18 October 2010

The Quickening by Michelle Hoover is a tale of the frontier, set in the early 20th century, and it revolves around two very different pioneer women. Enidina is a hard worn woman meant for life on a farm, and her neighbor Mary is a softer, feminine woman who desires something greater than the simple farm life that has been thrust upon her by a trauma in her childhood. Enidina is desperate for children, while Mary is burdened with three boys that make her even more desperate for escape. The two woman form an uneasy friendship and the story follows them through twenty years of trials and triumphs on the Iowa plains.

It is rare indeed that an author captures the essence of a setting so well that the reader feels it in their physical presence. If Michelle Hoover fails to do anything else in her novel, she has succeeded in that aspect, and succeeded superbly.

Hoover creates a setting so real, the reader can feel the heaviness of the rain, the cold dry winds of the winter, and the dry heat that kills the summer crops. The desolation of Iowa helps the reader to feel the desperation of Mary’s life and the spartan simpleness of Enidina’s. The story is told from the perspective of Enidina and Mary late in their lives as they review the past. This offers the reader a chance to see the same scene from two different perspectives, and the scene changes depending on the teller.

The drawback of the tale is unfortunately the stark realism Hoover creates. This usually compels an author to create sympathetic characters or emotional buy in. But Hoover does not take the story in that direction. So the plot drags at times and has the unfortunate attribute of being a story with no real conclusion, despite its vague interesting points. There isn’t any passion or zing to sink your teeth into as a reader. The stark realism leaves that reader with the empty feeling of having examined two flawed lives.

Grade: B-

Share

Movie Trailers sell Books

17 October 2010


If you’ve read through this blog, or you know me, then you know that I have a habit of picking up books because I saw the movie trailer: Atonement, Twilight, The Road, just to name a few. I probably won’t ever see the movie, but if it is a decent trailer, I will go get the book. Trailer editors must make a lot of money.

Never Let Me Go by Kazuro Ishiguro seemed to be about a proper British boarding school with a sinister secret, and a love triangle. The latter did not interest me so much as the former. Who doesn’t love a good boarding-with-a-secret story? The reader is presented with several questions:

  • Why are the Students of Hailsham Special?
  • Where are their parents?
  • Why are they at Hailsham?
  • Why must they stay healthy?
  • Why can’t they have children?

While the book did not turn out to be a mystery or thriller, it was a decent story. In the end, the story turned out to be nothing more than an allegory for the meaning of life, asking the age old question: What is our purpose?

Never Let Me Go centers around 3 characters, Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth. They all grew up at what seems to be an exclusive boarding school, with no parents in sight. The students of Hailsham are very “special”, but why? They all know they have a purpose, and the purpose and secret behind the Hailsham School is slowly revealed through the course of the story, as the reader travels through the trials of adolescence and adulthood with the trio.

The restrained emotion in the story is a detriment, and while I won’t reveal the secrets of the novel, the lack of emotion does not help the author’s final premise. The main character, Kathy, through whom we see the story, seems to lack any real desires or emotions. If this is intentional, it is not well done and a mistake in my estimation. My conclusion was that the lack of feeling and depth was due to one of two things, a man was writing a woman’s point of view, and that man was British. I don’t mean to feed into generalizations, but the British “stiff upper lip” was very present in the emotional depth of the characters.

The plot is steady, and the story is interesting, if only for the revelations of the purpose of Hailsham’s students. It dabbles in some very serious topics such as spirituality, love, the soul, the meaning of life, but never takes a goof bit out of any of them. Some of the scenes feel very grey and dull, but it is a sign of talent that one could feel the mists of England and the greyness bleeding through the pages. I would have liked to have seen more spark, more zing, but it was interesting enough to keep me reading.

Final Grade: B-

Share

Welcome Back Dracula!

14 October 2010

I like vampire stories. So sue me. And no, I’m not one of those bandwagoners who jumped into the fold with Twilight & True Blood. I am an old school Bram Stoker-Ann Rice- Vampires are supposed to be scary vampire fan. I have written serious papers on Nosferatu. And I just brought that to a whole new level of nerdy.
So when I heard that Justin Cronin was redeeming the quickly devolving monster known as “Vampire” with his debut novel The Passage, I was more excited that you can possibly imagine. I mean Red Sox winning the World Series excited. Ok, maybe not that much.
I bought The Passage at the height of the summer. And it delivered, for the most part. I had nightmares, I couldn’t sleep, I was afraid to go into a dark room. I mean that is pretty much a successful scary story. But, as is my trademark, I noticed the flaws. And there were only a few, tiny, minor issues:
1) He clearly had Margaret Atwood’s novel A Handmaid’s Tale right by his side when he wrote it. The whole second half of the novel was ripped off right from her style and set up.
2) It was too long. It didn’t need to be that long. This wasn’t The Stand. You are not Stephen King. Even Stephen King isn’t Stephen King anymore.

3) Speaking of Stephen King, if A Handmaid’s Tale was on the left side of his desk, The Stand was on the right side. There were many echoes and allusions to King’s epic apocalypse novel. Maybe that’s why King is Cronin’s #1 fan.
4) The main character, Peter, was a little boring. But his name was Peter, I find that all “Peter”s in literature and cinema are boring.
5) The most glaring problem of all: it is the first part of a trilogy. Big mistake, big. Huge.

Here is where he succeeded:
1) Strong and interesting female characters.
2) Seriously, gloriously scary vampires. Not a redeeming one in the lot of them.
3) Great plotline.

Grade: All in all, I am going to give him a B. Just a B. But I’ll be honest, when I found out it was a trilogy, it took a nose dive to C. But, when I finished the book, it was B. I’ll leave it at B.

I do NOT recommend this book for sensitive readers, young readers, and people with a faint heart.

Share

The Help by Kathryn Stockett

15 July 2010

Thanks to chasidar, I discovered a beautiful book on the essence of Southern culture: the race issue. Now I know some of you are going to say, “hello The Help has been on the NY Times bestseller list for 66 weeks”, but let’s just say the bestseller list is not how I gage what is actually good…if it was, then why is James Patterson on there? No offense to you Patterson-philes…just to Patterson himself.

The Help by Katheryn Stockett is set in the deep South as the Civil Rights movement is finding its wings. Our main characters are Skeeter Phelan, a young white debutante, Aibileen, a middle aged black maid/nanny who is good at her job, and Minny, a younger black maid who has a temper that sometimes lands her unemployed. Skeeter, a naïve fledging writer, stumbles upon the idea of writing a book about the “Help” of the South. Enlisting the help of a reluctant Aibileen and Minny, the three women embark on a journey to discover themselves in a time when a culture unwilling to change is being turned upside down.

All of the characters, with the exception of Skeeter, are fascinating. From the racist dictator like Junior League president, to the silly white trash Cinderella, to the perfect maid willing to commit a crime for her family, Stockett creates a full portrait of the complicated world that made up the female side of the pre-Civil Rights South. In addition to wonderful characters, Stockett, in the great tradition of Mark Twain, recreates with stunning clarity the vernacular of both the black and white characters of the novel.

My least favorite aspect of the book was the character of Skeeter, who unfortunately a narrator for a third of the novel. She is just a weak character, with very little gumption and a whole lot of naivety. She is used by Stockett as a tool to show the perspective from the white world, but her confusion and her sympathies make her waver between a two dimensional and three dimensional character, which makes her weak and wan in the novel.

Overall, despite one flaw, the book is a gem. It is an engaging and engrossing portrait of a by-gone era.

Grade: A-

Share
Next Page »