Why is everything a trilogy (or series)?

10 June 2011

I know, I have been shockingly neglectful. Not so many good excuses really. Sorry.

Now, here is something I am really sick of: trilogies or series.

Guess what all you budding writers out there? Not every book is meant to be more than one, maybe two books. Need some examples? Okay, Twilight. Two books tops, New Moon and Eclipse were clearly bridge books and don’t even get me started on the editing in Breaking Dawn. Hunger Games: two books tops, maybe even one long one. The Passage…what? How could there be more than one. the first one wasn’t long enough?

It seems to me that no one knows how to write stories in just one volume anymore, and if I open one more book that turns out to be the first in an “exciting new series”, I will not be pleased.

Share

100 Books in 2011

7 April 2011

I have officially joined a 100 books in 2011 challenge!

I am really only just getting into this whole world of blogging about books, so it is exciting to learn about all these challenges and the people who share my goals!

I joined the Book Chick City challenge which you can find here: http://networkedblogs.com/gfL2T

Join me! 100 books, we can do it!

Share

The End: Deaths in Fiction

24 March 2011

Now he belongs to the ages.”
Epitaph from Abraham Lincoln’s tombstone

Death has always been a fascination of mine. When I was a child I was labeled: odd, macabre, morbid even. Think Vada Sultenfuss in the movie My Girl. It seems being preoccupied with death works well with my Victorian fascination. But somehow I managed to grow up normal, but my interest in death didn’t subside. Death is a deeply symbolic act in literature, and specific character deaths always serve some great purpose on the part of the author. Sometimes I would cry, sometimes I would be heartbroken, and sometimes I would just ask “Why?” The following list is made up of the most profound literary deaths I have experienced in my reading career.

They aren’t the most famous ones, nor are they the most obvious ones (did no one see Dumbledore’s death coming?), but to me, they were the most meaningful.

While I was researching this, I found this great page on Wikipedia about of famous epitaphs:

Spoilers: If you have not read the following books and would still like to, don’t read the rest of my post:  Tuck Everlasting, The House of Mirth, Lord of the Rings, Animal Farm, Tess of the D’Ubervilles, The Stand, Interview with the Vampire, or Cold Mountain

ghostTombstone (more…)

Share

This Book is Rated R: Part 2

15 March 2011
Upon further reflection of my previous post on rating books (see post here), I have more thoughts to share on the matter of explicit or inappropriate books.

Books aren’t rated because there aren’t visuals. After a long argument with my husband and my friend whitefrodude, they held the position that if you read a book, and it starts to become inappropriate, you can just put it down. I argued that inappropriate language or scenes can just “pop” up with little warning. They insisted there had to be enough warning to skip or stop reading. I maintained that sometimes there isn’t. I could not determine if this is because I read too fast, or have read a larger quantity of books than they have.

This Book has been Rated R

This Book has been Rated R

Whichever the case, I have decided upon a “rating” system that would satisfy me. I propose that books have a rating system similar to television. This book is rated 13+, This book is rated 8+, This book is rated 21+. That way, I at least know what to expect and, based on my sensitivity, if I should bother buying it.

During our argument, whitefrodude mentioned that he did not approve of banning books for their content. I concurred, but, going back to Water for Elephants which was taken off the reading list in a New Hampshire high school, I do believe in limiting their availability to a certain audience. For example, I don’t think an overly explicit book with questionable literary content should be on a mandatory reading list in school. I don’t care if it is on the bookshelf at your local bookstore, but don’t make my kid read it.

On the other hand, I do think that certain books have questionable content (i.e. Huckleberry Finn’s use of the “N” word) which can illuminate a chapter in history for us. Mark Twain was using Huck’s racism and overbearing attitude towards Jim to demonstrate the plight of African-Americans in our society at the time. In addition, the “N” word was an acceptable adjective for an African-American. To ban or edit this book on this merit alone, re-writes a very important chapter of American history in an inappropriate manner. But the explicit moments in Water For Elephants add nothing to our understanding of Depression Era America, and therefore have no place in our children’s curriculum.

Share

Gatsby in 3D?

22 February 2011
gatsbyI waited too long. It was an announcement that shook my little world on Sunday morning. Baz Luhrman is going to adapt “The Great Gatsby”…in 3D…in Australia…with Leonardo DiCaprio. I am completely conflicted. For those of you who know me, you know that I am obsessed with this novel, and it is one of my life dream’s to write the ultimate adaptation a la Emma Thompson/Sense & Sensibility. So, I am going to break down how I feel about this.

Baz Luhrmann : I love Baz. I did not love Australia. Now while his track record should lead me to believe that he could suceced with this project, Gatsby is a very tricky project. Unlike many great novels, it does not lend itself to an easy adaptation, Gatsby is intense, introspective, and internal. and many have failed trying. Luhrmann could pull it off, but does he have the insight to make it innovative and his own? I am hopeful.

DiCaprio as Gatbsy: I am a huge fan of DiCaprio. I mean come on, I was 13 when Titanic came out, and watched Rome & Juliet at 14, how could I not be a fan? But no, seriously, I have loved pretty much everything he has been in, he is an amazing and intense actor. It’s the intense part that makes me nervous. Gatsby is a character filled with a kind of grim hope. He is a romantic until the end. DiCaprio is not an actor that lends himself to hope, usually more to despair.

Robert Redford received average reviews for his interpretation of Jay Gatsby in 1974

Robert Redford received average reviews for his interpretation of Jay Gatsby in 1974

3D: What? The novel is not strikingly visual, so what are they going to do? The green light, T.J. Eckleburg’s eyes…and then what? I am definitely not a fan of this part.

Nick: Casting of Nick is really the lynch pin to the whole piece, much more so than Gatsby. Nick is our narrator, our arbitor, our compass. With out Nick, the whole piece falls apart. Please cast Nick well!

Music: Luhrmann is exceptionally musical, and I think that is a big plus. In order to bring life to this novel, you have to go all or nothing, and music may just be the key to that (i.e. Sense & Sensibility and Clueless).

Overall, I am now filled with a grim hope. Will it be good? Will it be awful? With this bag, it has a potential of being any or all of these things.

Share

This Book is Rated R!

17 February 2011
If movies have to be rated and TV has to be rated, why aren’t books rated? Why isn’t there any warning that there may be extreme violence, extreme sexuality, grotesque visuals, and/or crude and vulgar language? I am the first person to line up and wax on poetically about how ridiculous it is to edit “Huckleberry Finn”. But several explicit scenes (and on one page even a picture!) in “Water for Elephants” pushed me over the edge.

Water for Elephants was explicit for my tastes.

Water for Elephants was explicit for my tastes.

If it’s one thing that drive me crazy about contemporary literature, it’s that it is crude. I’m talking Middle Ages, potty mouth crude. And I just don’t understand it? Why is it that you as a contemporary author feels the need to describe the most grotesque things about the human experience? No, I don’t need to know how this character feels when they use the bathroom, or how certain things look when one character walks in on another naked or in a compromising situation. In fact, why did those scenes have to be there at all?

While browsing on twitter, I discovered that a high school in Beford, New Hampshire was using Water for Elephants in its curriculum. Now there is a mini-uproar because it was challenged and removed from the class. While I am usually open-minded about these things, I agree with this decision. Water for Elephants had very graphic scenes, so much so, I had to put the book down on several occasions. And don’t give me that “it’s for the sake of the art” line. These scenes had no place in this story.

Suggestive ad for the upcoming season of True Blood

Suggestive ad for the upcoming season of True Blood

I understand that you are trying to capture the human condition, but if you wouldn’t talk about it at the dinner party, then why did you put it in my book?

Charlaine Harris said in an interview recently that True Blood, the really popular show with the vampires, is far more graphic than she ever imagined scenes in her books. Here is an author, who herself considers her scenes to be graphic, shocked by how far things are being taken in our culture.

The ridiculously popular “The Girl Who…” series by Stieg Larson, only seems to be popular because there is a shocking and explicit rape scene in the first book. Why, no please, seriously, why is that so compelling to read about? Most serious critics finally admitted that the books weren’t really that good, but that they were swept up in the popularity.

Our culture has gone above and beyond to prove that we can push the envelope and really lay out the human condition raw and exposed for all to see. But I for one am tired of it. Call me old-fashioned or too conservative, or whatever, but there comes a point when we push too far.

Share

Where are your books?

26 October 2010

Monday morning, my husband yells at me to turn on KQED because there is an article about books you can’t get rid of. In his words, “you HAVE to listen to it, it’s about you!” As I listened to Richard Friedlander’s two minute perspective on his books, my husband looks at me expectantly. “So?” he asks. I shook my head in disagreement. “That’s not me.” I said. “But I can definitely relate”. You can listen to the broadcast here.

Friedlander says of his old books: “I haven’t looked at any of the chosen few for years. They’re not me. They’re who I have been. My wax museum of former loves. Some day, yes, I might flip through one and re-experience something I once thought important enough to save. But looking back has never worked for me.” He ends with saying that he doesn’t know what to do with them anymore and they don’t really mean anything to him. On this point, we greatly differ.

My books are kept on my shelf in the office I share with my husband. They are me, that’s the point, that’s why they made the cut and didn’t get sent to the goodwill or library. I, like Friedlander, wonder what guests might think if they explored my little shelf, but then again, I never let anyone into my office. So unfortunately, they probably wouldn’t get a chance to search the shelves to make a psychoanalysis of who I am based on the strange mixture of genres.

Former loves? My love affair with these books is constant. I am obsessed with my shelf, I organize it and re-organize it, as if it’s special order that is known only to me makes a difference to my current state of affairs. Sometimes they are in backwards alphabetically order (a hold over from my childhood obsession with having a left-handed friendly library), sometimes they are in order of favorites, but currently they are in order of classy to trashy. So where once Pride & Prejudice , Twilight, Bill Clinton’s My Life, and Stephen King’s Everything’s Eventual all sat side by side; now Jane Austen rules the top shelf roost with Flannery O’Connor and Homer, while Stephenie Meyers sulks down with Jodi Picoult, Eva Ibbotson, and some Buffy the Vampire Slayer novels (yes, seriously). I won’t even discuss the current location of King or Gaiman, they have their own special shelves which causes me a constant stress. I seriously feel like I am hurting the books feelings if I feel their location is unfair.

I kept them because not only do I feel the books on this shelf define me, either now or as the person I once was, but because I do read them over and over again. No joke. I really have read The Stand four, no, maybe six times. I will just open Emma or Pride & Prejudice to random pages and start reading, Vonnegut and O’Connor are for rainy days. Who hasn’t re-reader The Oddesey or Idylls of the King? Ok, I’ll admit I may be a little nerdy there.

My husband says I am much younger than Friedlander, and I will mature out of this phase of hoarding books. I am wondering if he noticed the new shelf that has appeared in my daughter’s room of my favorite children’s books. My seven and a half month old daughter owns about 50 books. From Goodnight Moon to Madeline to Little House on the Prairie. And of course, I had to read these again upon purchase to “check them out” for my daughter. Yeah, sure sweetie, I’ll outgrow it…

If you don’t look at them anymore, what’s the point? People often express surprise that I can read a book more than once, but we aren’t talking about James Patterson or Breaking Dawn here people, we are talking about books that marked you, that made indelible impressions. Where do you keep your special books? Do they have an order, a system? Think about it for a minute. Now, imagine not having them.

So my answer to Mr. Friedlander is: give them away sir. But not just to a Goodwill, give them to a school library or a retirement center and give others a chance to live the joy you once had in these pages. Because if they are just collecting dust, you are starving them! They aren’t living up to their purpose! Don’t let your books waste away in the land of the forgotten and ignored.

Share